[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150402105209.GA9447@x1>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:52:09 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...aro.org, sboyd@...eaurora.org, kernel@...inux.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on
clocks
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Some hardware contains bunches of clocks which must never be
> > turned off. If drivers a) fail to obtain a reference to any
> > of these or b) give up a previously obtained reference
> > during suspend, the common clk framework will attempt to
> > disable them and a platform can fail irrecoverably as a
> > result. Usually the only way to recover from these failures
> > is to reboot.
> >
> > To avoid either of these two scenarios from catastrophically
> > disabling an otherwise perfectly healthy running system,
> > clocks can be identified as always-on using this property
> > from inside a clocksource's node. The CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED
> > flag will be applied to each clock instance named in this
> > property, thus preventing them from being shut down by the
> > framework.
>
> Great stuff.
>
> One minor comment is that assuming this works on stih407 and stih410
> to the extent that the platform can now boot without clk_ignore_unused
> kenel parameter then you should have an additional patch to remove
> clk_ignore_unused from the default bootargs in stih407-b2120.dts and
> stih410-b2120.dts files.
It's already on my TODO list:
TODO:
- Clock Domain
- Once the clk domain driver has been accepted, remove early returns in SPI driver
- Remove clk_ignore_unused from the DT files
- Add LMI1 clk to STiH418
> Maxime - Is it possible for you to test this series on stih418-b2199 as
> a well? As it could most likely also be removed from stih418-b2199.dts file
> to, but neither Lee or myself have the hardware to test.
Take a look at the third item on my TODO. :)
Yes Maxime, if you can test the set once I've completed item 3, that
would be splendid.
> Apart from that, for the series: -
> Acked-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Thanks Peter.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists