[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1427973330.4063.1410.camel@chaos.site>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 13:15:30 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/86] pci: export pci_ids.h and related cleanups
Le Thursday 02 April 2015 à 12:09 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 11:04:16AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Le Thursday 02 April 2015 à 01:23 -0700, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> > > The class ids are a hardware defintion, not a kernel API. Just use the
> > > definitions from libpci, or copy over the kernel header if you prefer
> > > it over the libpci definutions.
> >
> > I agree with Christoph, such defines would better come from
> > pciutils-devel, not the kernel.
>
> This just leads to code duplication. Projects that don't link with
> pciutils don't want to depend on it.
Well, they don't have to depend on anything then, they can keep defining
their own named IDs.
Please realize that 1* code duplication is impossible to avoid
completely and 2* this hardly qualifies as code duplication in the first
place (giving symbolic names to constants is not actual programming.)
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists