[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150403.150410.1238626255318297531.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:04:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: stsp@...t.ru, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mvneta: implement SGMII-based in-band link state
signaling
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:03:53 -0700
> On 02/04/15 17:51, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
>> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:24:59 +0300
>>
>>> @@ -2590,6 +2651,7 @@ static int mvneta_mdio_probe(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>>>
>>> static void mvneta_mdio_remove(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>>> {
>>> + fixed_phy_set_link_update(pp->phy_dev, NULL);
>>
>> I do not see any other driver doing this on shutdown.
>> Please show me why it is necessary.
>
> The primary reason is that if you do not do that, past the point where
> you call phy_disconnect(), we stop the PHY state machine, detach from
> the net_device, such that it won't invoke the adjust_link callback
> anymore. The fixed PHY driver, though will still keep calling the
> fixed_link_update callback asking the driver whether the link parameters
> need to be updated, and that will just cause a NULL pointer de-reference
> phydev->attached_dev, since we are now in detached state.
>
> I guess another way to fix that is to look for the PHY state in
> fixed_mdio_read() and do nothing if it is PHY_HALTED.
Ok I'll apply this mvneta patch to net-next then, thanks.
>> And if it is, all other drivers registering a fixed phy link update
>> function need to be adjusted to do the same thing.
>
> I think the bcmgenet driver is now doing this as a result of Petri's
> latest changes, and I meant to comment on that before the patch got in.
> drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c has a similar construct but does not invoke
> phy_disconnect() nor can be rmmod'd, so a lesser issue.
I just seems insane to me that phy_disconnect() doesn't stop the
callbacks from running.
Fixed PHY seems to me to suffer from a lack of proper integration
into the PHY layer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists