[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <551E64BC.6080203@list.ru>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 13:00:28 +0300
From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
Stas Sergeev <stsp@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mvneta: implement SGMII-based in-band link state signaling
03.04.2015 03:51, David Miller пишет:
> From: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:24:59 +0300
>
>> @@ -2590,6 +2651,7 @@ static int mvneta_mdio_probe(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>>
>> static void mvneta_mdio_remove(struct mvneta_port *pp)
>> {
>> + fixed_phy_set_link_update(pp->phy_dev, NULL);
>
> I do not see any other driver doing this on shutdown.
> Please show me why it is necessary.
Hello David, sorry for this being discussed in a different thread,
so here you have a few pointers to why is this needed:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/30/367
> And if it is, all other drivers registering a fixed phy link update
> function need to be adjusted to do the same thing.
Or, for example, get rid of the callback and add an API:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg323517.html
Then you get the patch that avoids all this call-back singing and dancing:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg323518.html
In any case, I posted 3 different implementations and hope
people will choose the best one (any choice is fine with me).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists