[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1428337159.634.132.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 18:19:19 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] tracing: Add 'hist' event trigger command
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 11:50 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 17:14:56 +0200
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/Makefile
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/Makefile
> >
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_HIST_TRIGGERS) += trace_events_hist.o
> >
> > To make sure I'm parsing this Makefile correctly: trace_events_hist.o
> > will never be part of a module, right?
>
> You don't need to be part of a module to need module.h. You may just
> need module info.
I understand.
But the main reason I added that remark was that recently I ran into a
few patches where I made annoying mistakes in parsing changes to
Makefiles. Doing so I wasted my own and other peoples time. So I decided
to be rather verbose when Makefiles are involved. Just so that people
can:
- mock me for not getting basic stuff right;
- stop paying attention to the rest of my remarks, because chances are I
didn't understand the patch in question correctly.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists