linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 06 Apr 2015 19:28:12 +0300
From:	"Grygorii.Strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure

On 04/06/2015 07:09 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>>>> Of course,  i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy() has to be fixed first
>>>> as proposed by Alexander Sverdlin here:
>>>>    https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/448994/.
>>>
>>> Okay, good that you said it. So I'll give his patch series priority over
>>> this one.
>>
>>
>> Sorry, but this series already mises few merge windows and it has a lot
>> of revied-by and tested-by, so could we proceed please?
>>
>> Re-based & re-sent http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg410810.html
>
> ??? Didn't you say above that Alexaders's patch is needed first?
>

Sorry for misunderstanding.

I said that if We'd like to continue and optimize more recovery path
then yes - Alexaders's patch will be needed (patch 2 from his series
[PATCH 2/3] i2c: davinci: Refactor i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy(), 
which, in turn need to be rebased as the first one in his series and 
re-send). And in my opinion all such improvements could be done by 
subsequent patches.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/