lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:10:22 -0500
From:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC:	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	<joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, aperture: Check for GART before accessing GART registers

On 4/2/2015 1:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
>> +	if (amd_gart_present())
>>   		amd_northbridges.flags |= AMD_NB_GART;
>>   
>>   	/*
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
>> index 76164e173a24..1cb170b06853 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c
>> @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void __init early_gart_iommu_check(void)
>>   	u64 aper_base = 0, last_aper_base = 0;
>>   	int aper_enabled = 0, last_aper_enabled = 0, last_valid = 0;
>>   
>> -	if (!early_pci_allowed())
>> +	if (!early_pci_allowed() || !amd_gart_present())
>>   		return;
>>   
>>   	/* This is mostly duplicate of iommu_hole_init */
>> @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ int __init gart_iommu_hole_init(void)
>>   	int i, node;
>>   
>>   	if (gart_iommu_aperture_disabled || !fix_aperture ||
>> -	    !early_pci_allowed())
>> +	    !early_pci_allowed() || !amd_gart_present())
>>   		return -ENODEV;
> So what happens if !early_pci_allowed() but the GART is present? We'll
> set amd_northbridges.flags |= AMD_NB_GART, but won't run any of the
> setup code in aperture_64.c, right? Is that a valid setup?
>

It might be a valid setup. But it would work correctly only if BIOS did 
the right thing with setting up aperture space.

If !early_pci_allowed() and BIOS did not setup aperture correctly, that 
would have caused problems already.
But it has not been an issue so far right?

Thanks,
-Aravind.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ