[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150407123457.GA3681@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 14:34:57 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, joro@...tes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, aperture: Check for GART before accessing GART
registers
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 06:10:22PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> >So what happens if !early_pci_allowed() but the GART is present? We'll
> >set amd_northbridges.flags |= AMD_NB_GART, but won't run any of the
> >setup code in aperture_64.c, right? Is that a valid setup?
>
> It might be a valid setup. But it would work correctly only if BIOS did the
> right thing with setting up aperture space.
>
> If !early_pci_allowed() and BIOS did not setup aperture correctly, that
> would have caused problems already.
> But it has not been an issue so far right?
I think the right question to ask is:
What are we doing when there's no GART?
So what you probably want to do is:
if (!amd_gart_present())
return -ENODEV;
*before* the compound check.
Now, if we have detected a GART, i.e., amd_gart_present() is TRUE, the
code will behave as it used to behave before.
This should be the least intrusive change going forward IMHO.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists