[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWGqjyp9YABc=BvzFSm7Tj7reojOoMPDybQZ1RYXD8XZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 18:13:54 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PCI: Set pref for mem64 resource of pcie device
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> For "[PATCH 1/3] PCI: Introduce pci_bus_addr_t", I'm waiting for an updated
> version with Kconfig tweaks so we don't break other arches.
I was thinking that you will update it manually.
>
> For "[PATCH 2/3] sparc/PCI: Add mem64 resource parsing for root bus", I'm
> waiting for a version that fixes the other of_bus_pci_get_flags() and
> pci_parse_of_flags() implementations at the same time (or an explanation
> about why we should fix only the arch/sparc version). I don't want to fix
> one place and leave the same bug in other places.
I don't even know if other arch like powerpc support 64-bit bus address.
No one from powerpc reported a problem, why should we mess it up now?
I would like to see someone get access those three kinds of machine that support
of to unify of support code.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists