[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55233227.9090701@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:25:59 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4 V6] workqueue: Allow modifying low level unbound workqueue
cpumask
On 04/06/2015 11:53 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:14:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> /* make a copy of @attrs and sanitize it */
>> copy_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs, attrs);
>> - cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, wq_unbound_global_cpumask);
>> + copy_workqueue_attrs(pwq_attrs, attrs);
>> + cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
>> + cpumask_and(pwq_attrs->cpumask, pwq_attrs->cpumask, unbound_cpumask);
>
> Hmmm... why do we need to keep track of both cpu_possible_mask and
> unbound_cpumask? Can't we just make unbound_cpumask replace
> cpu_possible_mask for unbound workqueues?
>
I want to save the original user-setting cpumask.
When any time the wq_unbound_global_cpumask is changed,
the new effective cpumask is
the-original-user-setting-cpumask & wq_unbound_global_cpumask
instead of
the-last-effective-cpumask & wq_unbound_global_cpumask.
thanks,
Lai
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists