linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Move message tracepoints to their own header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 10:21:46 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Move message tracepoints to their own header

On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 08:58:58 +0200
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:

> On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 23:13 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Every tracing file must have its own TRACE_SYSTEM defined.
> 
> Oh, that requirement is new to me. I also have the same in iwlwifi, with
> even more TRACE_SYSTEMs.

OK, the reason I did not stumble over this is because the previous
patch broke the build before I got here.

During my latest tests, this breaks it too.

You OK if I make more patches to split that file apart?

Thanks,

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/