[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5523E7E9.7010805@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 19:51:29 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: core: Fix error checking in (devm_)phy_optional_get
Hi,
On Tuesday 07 April 2015 05:13 PM, Axel Lin wrote:
> Don't pass valid pointer to PTR_ERR, use PTR_ERR(phy) only when
> IS_ERR(phy) is true.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> index 3791838f..f112fff 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
> @@ -530,8 +530,10 @@ struct phy *phy_optional_get(struct device *dev, const char *string)
> {
> struct phy *phy = phy_get(dev, string);
>
> - if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> - phy = NULL;
> + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> + if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
This can simply be (IS_ERR(phy) && (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)).
But I don't see a problem passing a valid pointer to PTR_ERR here.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists