linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: remove duplicate code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150407144133.GD31260@sudip-PC>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 20:11:33 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Willy Tarreau <willy@...a-x.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: panel: remove duplicate code

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:12:06PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 03:26:58PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 02:55:02PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:49:30AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 01:55:01PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I hadn't looked at this driver much before.  It sucks that
> > > > > parport_driver ->attach() functions can't fail... 
> > > > 
> > > > then maybe, we can change the code of parport. currently attach and
> > > > parport_register_driver never fails. we can modify it so that if attach
> > > > fails then parport_register_driver will also fail. will not be that much
> > > > difficult as it has been used only in 13 places.
> > > > your views ?
> > > > 
> > > > and since we are discussing parallel ports, few days back i saw one
> > > > post in ubuntuforums that his scanner is not working because of
> > > > lack of ppscsi.I mailed Tim Waugh, but he is not interested to work
> > > > with ppscsi anymore. parallel port scanners are almost a thing of the past
> > > > now. do you think it is worth that i pick up the code and modify
> > > > it for our latest kernel and submit to Greg ?
> > > 
> > > If you have some parport hardware, and want to take it on, that would be
> > > great.  The code needs a maintainer, and the apis are _really_ old and
> > > messy, as you have found out.
> > what kind of parport hardware will you suggest?
> 
> No idea, go look at the drivers and code to figure that out.
i guess i asked the question in a wrong way.
i already have pc with parport. what i wanted to ask was do i
need any other hardware (like parallel port scanner) to start with
ppscsi?

regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/