linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Drop debugging leftover trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1428417788.20888.108.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:43:08 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Drop debugging leftover trace_printk call

On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 10:34 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:26:13 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 10:10 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:01:37 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > > o ERROR seems a bit strong, WARN is probably good enough
[]
> I still rather have this be an ERROR and not a WARN, because I rather
> avoid even those that encapsulate it with CONFIG_FOO_DEBUG.

Whichever is chosen is fine with me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/