[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150408014630.GF7213@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:46:30 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
bhe@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/numa: kernel stack corruption fix
> >
> > - /* Mark all kernel nodes. */
> > + /*
> > + * Mark all kernel nodes.
> > + *
> > + * In case booting with mem=nn[kMG] or in kdump kernel, numa_meminfo
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> It should both set mem=xx and numa=off, then numa_meminfo may not include all
> the memblock.reserved memory, right?
Yasuaki Ishimatsu suggests to remove numa=off in comment because in theory there's such
possiblity that it may happen even without numa=off. Just consider the non-snb board..
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists