linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150408041257.GC14618@fury.dvhart.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 21:12:57 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Daren,
> >>
> >> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> >>> Hi Shuah,
> >>>
> >>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
> >>> kselftest.
> >>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
> >>> stress may
> >>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
> >>>
> >>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others
> >>> that would
> >>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile
> >>> and not
> >>> creating new typedefs.
> >>>
> >>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your
> >>> convenience
> >>> as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC.
> >> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the
> >> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2.
> > 
> > OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and
> > respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these.
> > Which do you prefer?
> > 

...

> You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the
> patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin
> just in case, I have other comments.

Hi Shuah,

Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/