linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2015 23:41:52 -0600
From:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
CC:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

On 04/07/2015 10:12 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Daren,
>>>>
>>>> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>>
>>>>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
>>>>> kselftest.
>>>>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
>>>>> stress may
>>>>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
>>>>>
>>>>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others
>>>>> that would
>>>>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile
>>>>> and not
>>>>> creating new typedefs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your
>>>>> convenience
>>>>> as well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC.
>>>> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the
>>>> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2.
>>>
>>> OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate and
>>> respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge these.
>>> Which do you prefer?
>>>
> 
> ...
> 
>> You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the
>> patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin
>> just in case, I have other comments.
> 
> Hi Shuah,
> 
> Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests?
> 
> Thanks,
> 


Sorry Daren. I got called away on a family emergency. The patch
looks good to me and I don't have any additional comments.

Assume these get pulled in for 4.2 release. I will get to them
soon once the 4.1-rc1 is out.

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/