linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D14B5F7D.C64EC%dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 08 Apr 2015 22:44:11 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-api@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] selftest: Add futex functional tests

On 4/8/15, 10:41 PM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:

>On 04/07/2015 10:12 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37:51AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 03/31/2015 10:24 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>> On 3/31/15, 8:32 AM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Daren,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/27/2015 04:17 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Shuah,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into
>>>>>> kselftest.
>>>>>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and
>>>>>> stress may
>>>>>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored
>>>>>>others
>>>>>> that would
>>>>>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using
>>>>>>volatile
>>>>>> and not
>>>>>> creating new typedefs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patches will follow, but I'm providing a pull request for your
>>>>>> convenience
>>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for acting on this so quickly after we talked about it at ELC.
>>>>> Just a quick note that I am going to get to this soon once I get the
>>>>> 4.1 content wrapped up. We can plan upon getting these into 4.2.
>>>>
>>>> OK. Michael E. provided some feedback which I can either incorporate
>>>>and
>>>> respin, or I can send as a follow-on to your -next after you merge
>>>>these.
>>>> Which do you prefer?
>>>>
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>>> You can wait to re-do patches. I am planning to review the
>>> patch set later on this week. That way you can avoid re-spin
>>> just in case, I have other comments.
>> 
>> Hi Shuah,
>> 
>> Did you have any additional comments for the futex tests?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>
>
>Sorry Daren. I got called away on a family emergency. The patch
>looks good to me and I don't have any additional comments.

No problem, hope things are alright.

>
>Assume these get pulled in for 4.2 release. I will get to them
>soon once the 4.1-rc1 is out.

You had some initial comments, do you want me to tend to those and resend,
or will you pull as is and have me follow-up - either is fine, just let me
know what you prefer.

Thanks,


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/