[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150408052825.GC31970@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 22:28:25 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, mturquette@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] clk: Provide support for always-on clocks
On 04/07, Lee Jones wrote:
> Lots of platforms contain clocks which if turned off would prove fatal.
> The only way to recover from these catastrophic failures is to restart
> the board(s). Now, when a clock provider is registered with the
> framework it is possible for a list of always-on clocks to be supplied
> which must be kept ungated. Each clock mentioned in the newly
> introduced 'clock-always-on' will be clk_prepare_enable()d where the
> normal references will be taken. This will prevent the common clk
> framework from attempting to gate them during the clk_disable_unused()
> and disable_clock() procedures.
Ah I see now. The disable_clock() part is from the PM core not
the common clock framework. This paragraph could be the commit
text for the binding patch.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists