linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V1 1/2] input: misc: da9063: OnKey driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7014B2139E2@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:12:07 +0000
From:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	DT <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	INPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V1 1/2] input: misc: da9063: OnKey driver

On 09 April 2015 09:48 Paul Bolle wrote:

> > This patch is dependent on PATCH V1 2/2
>     This patch is dependent on PATCH V1 1/2
> Which makes it all rather confusing.

It is a bit circular, I'll take that out for the next patch

> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/da9063-onkey.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
> > +/* da9063-onkey.c - Onkey device driver for DA9063
> > + * Copyright (C) 2013  Dialog Semiconductor Ltd.
> > + *
> > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
> > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> > + * version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > + *
> > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> GNU
> > + * Library General Public License for more details.
> > + */
> 
> This states the license is GPL v2 or later.
> 
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> 
> And (according to include/linux/module.h) this states the license is
> (just) GPL v2.

Ah, I'll fix that for the future.

Thanks for the comments,
Regards,
Steve