linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:31:19 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org, lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, kaber@...sh.net,
	pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink_log
 proc file

Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches:
> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use
>> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values.
> 
> Hey Richard.
> 
> Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next
> as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses.
> 
> Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next?

Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened
because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already.
Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used
git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old
branch were taken.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/