[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150410.124027.1369874709878370130.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: richard@....at
Cc: joe@...ches.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
kaber@...sh.net, pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink_log
proc file
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 09:31:19 +0200
> Am 10.04.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Joe Perches:
>> On Thu, 2015-04-09 at 23:57 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use
>>> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values.
>>
>> Hey Richard.
>>
>> Just to clarify, this patch is for net and not for net-next
>> as net-next has removed the seq_printf return uses.
>>
>> Are you going to submit an equivalent patch for net-next?
>
> Hmm, you are right. It took me a few minutes to figure out what happened
> because I did rebase my patches to net-next and fixed up 5/5 already.
> Reading yesterday's bash history shows that I've used
> git format-patch in a wrong way such that the comments from the old
> branch were taken.
I'm waiting for you to respin this series against net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists