[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVeexkD1_x89jKOkPbkc8KF7WFRH1UgOb484cYp77zTjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:38:14 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86: Add documentation for rd/wr fs/gs base
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I think that your __switch_to is buggy and that's why the selectors
>> need to be zero. Is that the only issue? If so, let's fix the bug
>> instead.
>
> I don't think there is a bug.
So what's the issue?
If user code programs fs != 0 and fsbase != whatever is implied by fs
and the GDT/LDT, what happens? There's already a minor buglet in that
area without wrfsbase, but fixing it would be a big performance hit
because we don't have rdfsbase and rdgsbase to read the state
efficiently. (Specifically, if we have gs == 0, gsbase == 0, but
*saved* gsbase != 0, then we corrupt gsbase on context switch.)
But, with the new instructions, we can do it simply, efficiently, and
correctly in all cases. Let's do so.
--Andy
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists