[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55298E4F.50502@nod.at>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:12:47 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, hskinnemoen@...il.com,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Miao Steven <realmz6@...il.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
"JACQUIOT-XID, Aurelien" <a-jacquiot@...com>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
liqin.linux@...il.com, Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, cmetcalf@...hip.com,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Remove execution domain support
Am 11.04.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>>
>> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
>> and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
>> obviously incomplete and abandoned
>
> Ack. The whole exec domain made some code code pretty inscrutable.
>
> So I'd certainly be willing to pull this during the 4.1 merge window
> if nobody complains.
>
> Anybody?
It would be great to have an Ack from sparc folks.
I had to recalculate the values of their TI_* constants
and I don't have a sparc box to test it.
Using asm-offsets.c for that seems to be impossible on sparc
as sparc's asm-offsets.c depends on sched.h which depends again
on thread_info.h...
Resolving this circular dependency without the ability to run-time
test my changes was too risky for me.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists