linux-kernel - Re: Remove execution domain support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150411.153111.1993644186381489454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 11 Apr 2015 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	richard@....at
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rth@...ddle.net,
	ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com, vgupta@...opsys.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com,
	will.deacon@....com, hskinnemoen@...il.com, egtvedt@...fundet.no,
	realmz6@...il.com, msalter@...hat.com, a-jacquiot@...com,
	starvik@...s.com, jesper.nilsson@...s.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	rkuo@...eaurora.org, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, james.hogan@...tec.com, monstr@...str.eu,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, lftan@...era.com, jonas@...thpole.se,
	jejb@...isc-linux.org, deller@....de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, liqin.linux@...il.com,
	lennox.wu@...il.com, cmetcalf@...hip.com, jdike@...toit.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Remove execution domain support

From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 23:12:47 +0200

> Am 11.04.2015 um 22:52 schrieb Linus Torvalds:
>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>>>
>>> The removal will make architecutre specific signal handling easier
>>> and there is no need to keep execuction domains as this feature is
>>> obviously incomplete and abandoned
>> 
>> Ack. The whole exec domain made some code code pretty inscrutable.
>> 
>> So I'd certainly be willing to pull this during the 4.1 merge window
>> if nobody complains.
>> 
>> Anybody?
> 
> It would be great to have an Ack from sparc folks.
> I had to recalculate the values of their TI_* constants
> and I don't have a sparc box to test it.

I'm fine with it, I'll fix it up if needed:

Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/