[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2603418.sEMfdEBYRq@wuerfel>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:07:02 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: Refactor Exynos5 boards for phandle notation
On Sunday 12 April 2015 21:24:47 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> The phandle notation reduces possible mistakes when overriding nodes
> by child board files and reduces duplication of addresses.
>
> The patchset refactors Exynos5 boards to use the phandle way.
>
> Tested by comparison of decompiled DTB for each commit.
The patches look fine, but the description is wrong as you are not
using 'phandles' here, you are using 'labels'.
A phandle is a reference to another device node inside of a property,
and while that is normally done using labels like
interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
you can just as well use the full path in a phandle.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists