linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: Refactor Exynos5 boards for phandle notation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPekqfWn0E8R2NWgS656mcBjiAzOeoLvMEx=vbnAyupF-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 19:54:40 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozłowski <k.kozlowski.k@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ARM: dts: Refactor Exynos5 boards for phandle notation

2015-04-13 5:07 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Sunday 12 April 2015 21:24:47 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>> The phandle notation reduces possible mistakes when overriding nodes
>> by child board files and reduces duplication of addresses.
>>
>> The patchset refactors Exynos5 boards to use the phandle way.
>>
>> Tested by comparison of decompiled DTB for each commit.
>
> The patches look fine, but the description is wrong as you are not
> using 'phandles' here, you are using 'labels'.

Heh, I suspected this but some docs I found referred to "&label { ...
}" also as a phandle. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll respin.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/