linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9790151.kO7BNWOEJr@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:48:53 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
	guohanjun@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is_offline()

On Monday, April 13, 2015 04:27:16 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2015年04月11日 07:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > acpi_scan_is_offline() may be called under the physical_node_lock
> > of the given device object's parent, so prevent lockdep from
> > complaining about that by annotating that instance with
> > SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING.
> 
> I think this is trigged by setting acpi_force_hot_remove to 1,
> in acpi_scan_hot_remove():
> 
>          if (device->handler && device->handler->hotplug.demand_offline
>              && !acpi_force_hot_remove) {
>                  if (!acpi_scan_is_offline(device, true))
>                          return -EBUSY;
>          } else {
>                  int error = acpi_scan_try_to_offline(device);
>                  if (error)
>                          return error;
>          }
> 
> then the container device will be removed by acpi_scan_try_to_offline(),
> let's wait for Xiuqi's test result.

I'm not sure what you mean.  demand_offline is 'true' for containers, so
acpi_force_hot_remove doesn't matter here.


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/