[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150413043725.19585.5717@quantum>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:37:25 -0700
From: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"Nicolas Ferre" <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: "Jonas Andersson" <jonas@...robit.se>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: pll: fix input range validity check
Quoting Boris Brezillon (2015-03-28 18:53:43)
> The PLL impose a certain input range to work correctly, but it appears that
> this input range does not apply on the input clock (or parent clock) but
> on the input clock after it has passed the PLL divisor.
> Fix the implementation accordingly.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> Reported-by: Jonas Andersson <jonas@...robit.se>
Hi Boris,
OK, so this patch along with your two previous submissions kind of
tackle some of items I mentioned earlier today[0].
Does this patch, combined with your two prior patches[1][2] resolve the
issue you brought up in your "Propagating clock rate constraints"
thread[3]?
[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150412235021.19585.27431@...ntum>
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593728-9366-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1427593533-9019-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
[3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20150327004054.2f6f34ee@...ezillon>
Regards,
Mike
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> index 6ec79db..cbbe403 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-pll.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,7 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
> int i = 0;
>
> /* Check if parent_rate is a valid input rate */
> - if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min ||
> - parent_rate > characteristics->input.max)
> + if (parent_rate < characteristics->input.min)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> /*
> @@ -187,6 +186,15 @@ static long clk_pll_get_best_div_mul(struct clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate,
> if (!mindiv)
> mindiv = 1;
>
> + if (parent_rate > characteristics->input.max) {
> + tmpdiv = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, characteristics->input.max);
> + if (tmpdiv > PLL_DIV_MAX)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + if (tmpdiv > mindiv)
> + mindiv = tmpdiv;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Calculate the maximum divider which is limited by PLL register
> * layout (limited by the MUL or DIV field size).
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists