[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150414153757.GA10861@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:37:57 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, Honggang Li <honli@...hat.com>,
roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, alex.estrin@...el.com, dledford@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, erezsh@...lanox.com, maheshb@...gle.com,
jbenc@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
linux@...ck-us.net, sfeldma@...il.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next 3/4] macvlan: fix possible NULL pointer
dereference in macvlan_dev_get_iflink
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:35:12PM +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 14/04/2015 17:26, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> >On 14.04, Honggang Li wrote:
> [snip]
> >>- return vlan->lowerdev->ifindex;
> >>+ if (vlan && vlan->lowerdev)
> >>+ return vlan->lowerdev->ifindex;
> >
> >That is completely useless. vlan (=netdev_priv) can not be NULL as
> >netdev_priv() never returns NULL and vlan->lowerdev is always valid
> >because a macvlan wouldn't make much sense otherwise.
> >
> And I suspect that it is the same for ipvlan and dsa.
I agree about DSA. I don't see any way this could happen.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists