lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <552EAF9D.8050400@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date:	Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:36:13 -0400
From:	Hal Rosenstock <hal@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
CC:	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
	Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
	Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
	Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/28] IB/Verbs: Implement new callback query_transport()

On 4/13/2015 8:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> index 65994a1..d54f91e 100644
> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> @@ -75,10 +75,13 @@ enum rdma_node_type {
>  };
>  
>  enum rdma_transport_type {
> +	/* legacy for users */
>  	RDMA_TRANSPORT_IB,
>  	RDMA_TRANSPORT_IWARP,
>  	RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC,
> -	RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP
> +	RDMA_TRANSPORT_USNIC_UDP,
> +	/* new transport */
> +	RDMA_TRANSPORT_IBOE,
>  };
>  
>  __attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
> @@ -1501,6 +1504,8 @@ struct ib_device {
>  	int		           (*query_port)(struct ib_device *device,
>  						 u8 port_num,
>  						 struct ib_port_attr *port_attr);
> +	enum rdma_transport_type   (*query_transport)(struct ib_device *device,
> +						      u8 port_num);
>  	enum rdma_link_layer	   (*get_link_layer)(struct ib_device *device,
>  						     u8 port_num);
>  	int		           (*query_gid)(struct ib_device *device,

libibverbs also exposes transport at the device level. Isn't a change to
make transport per port rather than per device needed there as well to
be consistent with these proposed kernel changes ? If so, would the
additional IBoE transport be exposed ? We also need to worry about
backward compatibility for existing applications.

-- Hal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ