linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] nvme: LightNVM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1504161528010.32385@localhost.lm.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:52:12 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:	Javier González <javier@...etta.io>
cc:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
	Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>,
	hch@...radead.org, axboe@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5 v2] nvme: LightNVM support

On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Javier González wrote:
>> On 16 Apr 2015, at 16:55, Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise it looks pretty good to me, but I think it would be cleaner if
>> the lightnvm stuff is not mixed in the same file with the standard nvme
>> command set. We might end up splitting nvme-core in the future anyway
>> for command sets and transports.
>
> Would you be ok with having nvme-lightnvm for LightNVM specific
> commands?

Sounds good to me, but I don't really have a dog in this fight. :)