linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5530B418.1050400@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:19:52 +0800
From:	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<guohanjun@...wei.com>, <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / scan: Annotate physical_node_lock in acpi_scan_is_offline()

On 2015/4/11 7:31, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> acpi_scan_is_offline() may be called under the physical_node_lock
> of the given device object's parent, so prevent lockdep from
> complaining about that by annotating that instance with
> SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING.
> 
> Reported-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Tested-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>

Thanks,
Xie XiuQi

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,11 @@ bool acpi_scan_is_offline(struct acpi_de
>  	struct acpi_device_physical_node *pn;
>  	bool offline = true;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&adev->physical_node_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * acpi_container_offline() calls this for all of the container's
> +	 * children under the container's physical_node_lock lock.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock_nested(&adev->physical_node_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(pn, &adev->physical_node_list, node)
>  		if (device_supports_offline(pn->dev) && !pn->dev->offline) {
> 
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/