linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 1/2] input: misc: da9063: OnKey driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1429343726.16771.129.camel@x220>
Date:	Sat, 18 Apr 2015 09:55:26 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	DT <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	INPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V2 1/2] input: misc: da9063: OnKey driver

There's still a license mismatch left (it probably got lost in the noise
when I finally noticed that the header comment mentioned the LGPL in
V1).

On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 13:03 +0100, S Twiss wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/da9063-onkey.c

> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
> + * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.

This states the license is GPL v2 or later.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

And, according to include/linux/module.h, this states the license is
just GPL v2. So I think either the license comment or the license ident
used in the MODULE_LICENSE() macro needs to change.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/