[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55351838.2060006@profitbricks.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:16:08 +0200
From: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hal@....mellanox.co.il
CC: Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 19/27] IB/Verbs: Use management helper cap_iw_cm()
On 04/20/2015 04:00 PM, Steve Wise wrote:
> On 4/20/2015 3:40 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
[snip]
>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> index 6805e3e..e4999f6 100644
>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> @@ -1818,6 +1818,21 @@ static inline int cap_ib_cm(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num)
>> return rdma_ib_or_iboe(device, port_num);
>> }
>> +/**
>> + * cap_iw_cm - Check if the port of device has the capability IWARP
>> + * Communication Manager.
>> + *
>> + * @device: Device to be checked
>> + * @port_num: Port number of the device
>> + *
>> + * Return 0 when port of the device don't support IWARP
>> + * Communication Manager.
>> + */
>> +static inline int cap_iw_cm(struct ib_device *device, u8 port_num)
>> +{
>> + return rdma_tech_iwarp(device, port_num);
>> +}
>> +
>> int ib_query_gid(struct ib_device *device,
>> u8 port_num, int index, union ib_gid *gid);
>>
>
> iWARP devices _must_ support the IWCM so cap_iw_cm() is not really useful.
Sean suggested to add this helper paired with cap_ib_cm(), may be there are
some consideration on maintainability?
Me too also prefer this way to make the code more readable ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists