linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: kizbox: update and rename to at91-kizbox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150421120817.6d368c42@bbrezillon>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:08:17 +0200
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Gaël PORTAY <g.portay@...rkiz.com>
Cc:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: kizbox: update and rename to at91-kizbox

On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:03:58 +0200
Gaël PORTAY <g.portay@...rkiz.com> wrote:

> On 21/04/2015 09:11, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Gael,
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:13:38 +0200
> > Gaël PORTAY <g.portay@...rkiz.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Sort nodes, rename to match Atmel naming convention
> > You should use -M when you generate your patches with format-patch: it
> > keeps track of files that have been renamed instead of considering it
> > as a removal + an addition.
> 
> Ok, thanks, I did not know that option...
> 
> >> and update the features
> >> below:
> >>   - command-line,
> >>   - use proper serial uart,
> >>   - rename leds and gpio-keys,
> >>   - update to pwm-leds and
> >>   - fix gpio-key level.
> > Please split this patch so we can easily review the changes.
> > How about the following separation ?
> >
> > - rename dts file
> > - use stdout-path
> > - sanitize bootargs
> > - led related changes (rename + pwm-leds)
> > - gpio-key related changes (rename + fix level)
> 
> In fact, each changes were committed in single patch before I submitted 
> them...
> 
> I just squashed them thinking it would be easier for you to check (only) 
> for the "new" device-tree.... my bad :(
> 
> What about the node re-order? Do you prefer in dedicated commit or with 
> the rename patch?

Keep it separated from the rename patch.

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/