lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429643039.9234.4.camel@picadillo>
Date:	Tue, 21 Apr 2015 12:03:59 -0700
From:	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Cc:	rostedt@...dmis.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] tracing: 'hist' triggers

On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 12:36 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On 04/21/2015 12:03 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:52 +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >> On 04/10/2015 06:05 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> >> So I am wondering if the path from ftrace_trigger_soft_disabled()
> >> to event_triggers_call() is supposed never to happen? The comment
> >> on ftrace_trigger_soft_disabled() indicate this might happen on
> >> normal operation:
> >>
> > 
> > So I looked at this on the plane and you're right, this is a path that
> > should never be taken in this case, since the hist trigger does set the
> > post_trigger flag and should therefore TRIGGER_COND would be true and
> > that block should never be entered.
> > 
> > However, the code that registers the trigger first enables the event,
> > then sets the cond flag, which would allow this to happen - a trigger
> > expecting data would be passed a NULL rec.
> > 
> > Can you try the patch below and see if it fixes the problem? (untested
> > and I haven't even had a chance to compile-test it..)
> 
> Thanks for the explanation. With that and your patch I could get
> it working. There are a couple of calling places missing in your
> patch. With them it works nicely. Maybe moving update_cond_flag()
> inside trace_event_trigger_enable_disable() would be an option?
> 

Yeah, I guess I missed the most important bit in my haste, but glad it
works for you now.  I'll write up a proper patch as soon as I can..

Thanks,

Tom

> cheers,
> daniel
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 4d8f5df..221ab1f 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -1471,11 +1471,12 @@ static int hist_register_trigger(char *glob, struct event_trigger_ops *ops,
>  	list_add_rcu(&data->list, &file->triggers);
>  	ret++;
>  
> +	update_cond_flag(file);
>  	if (trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 1) < 0) {
>  		list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> +		update_cond_flag(file);
>  		ret--;
>  	}
> -	update_cond_flag(file);
>   out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> index 8c8f2ee..e47a229 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> @@ -1264,6 +1264,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_func(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
>  		goto out_free;
>  	}
>  
> +	update_cond_flag(file);
>  	ret = trace_event_enable_disable(event_enable_file, 1, 1);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto out_put;
> @@ -1286,6 +1287,7 @@ int event_enable_trigger_func(struct event_command *cmd_ops,
>   out_disable:
>  	trace_event_enable_disable(event_enable_file, 0, 1);
>   out_put:
> +	update_cond_flag(file);
>  	module_put(event_enable_file->event_call->mod);
>   out_free:
>  	if (cmd_ops->set_filter)
> 
> 
> 
>  
> > Tom
> > 
> > [PATCH] tracing: Update cond flag before enabling or disabling a trigger
> > 
> > Before a trigger is enabled, the cond flag should be set beforehand,
> > otherwise an trigger that's expecting to process a trace record
> > (e.g. one with post_trigger set) could be invoked without one.
> > 
> > Likewise a trigger's cond flag should be reset after it's disabled,
> > not before.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> > index 7105f15..108e46c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c
> > @@ -546,11 +546,12 @@ static int register_trigger(char *glob, struct event_trigger_ops *ops,
> >  	list_add_rcu(&data->list, &file->triggers);
> >  	ret++;
> >  
> > +	update_cond_flag(file);
> >  	if (trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 1) < 0) {
> >  		list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> > +		update_cond_flag(file);
> >  		ret--;
> >  	}
> > -	update_cond_flag(file);
> >  out:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -578,8 +579,8 @@ void unregister_trigger(char *glob, struct event_trigger_ops *ops,
> >  		if (data->cmd_ops->trigger_type == test->cmd_ops->trigger_type) {
> >  			unregistered = true;
> >  			list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> > -			update_cond_flag(file);
> >  			trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 0);
> > +			update_cond_flag(file);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -1324,11 +1325,12 @@ int event_enable_register_trigger(char *glob,
> >  	list_add_rcu(&data->list, &file->triggers);
> >  	ret++;
> >  
> > +	update_cond_flag(file);
> >  	if (trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 1) < 0) {
> >  		list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> > +		update_cond_flag(file);
> >  		ret--;
> >  	}
> > -	update_cond_flag(file);
> >  out:
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -1351,8 +1353,8 @@ void event_enable_unregister_trigger(char *glob,
> >  		    (enable_data->file == test_enable_data->file)) {
> >  			unregistered = true;
> >  			list_del_rcu(&data->list);
> > -			update_cond_flag(file);
> >  			trace_event_trigger_enable_disable(file, 0);
> > +			update_cond_flag(file);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ