[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5537F754.2020909@sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:32:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
"sbsiddha@...il.com" <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, mpx: use new tsk_get_xsave_addr()
On 04/22/2015 12:18 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
>> > @@ -498,12 +497,12 @@ out_unmap:
>> > * bound table is 16KB. With 64-bit mode, the size of BD is 2GB,
>> > * and the size of each bound table is 4MB.
>> > */
>> > -static int do_mpx_bt_fault(struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf)
>> > +static int do_mpx_bt_fault(struct task_struct *tsk)
> Do you need the parameter "tsk"? It's not used in this function.
> Seems this function doesn't need to take any parameter.
See the last patch in the series, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists