lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3E5A0FA7E9CA944F9D5414FEC6C712205C8CF879@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:21:00 +0000
From:	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
	"riel@...hat.com" <riel@...hat.com>,
	"sbsiddha@...il.com" <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
	"luto@...capital.net" <luto@...capital.net>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 02/17] x86, mpx: use new tsk_get_xsave_addr()

> From: Dave Hansen [mailto:dave@...1.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:33 PM
> To: Yu, Fenghua; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: x86@...nel.org; tglx@...utronix.de; dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com;
> oleg@...hat.com; bp@...en8.de; riel@...hat.com; sbsiddha@...il.com;
> luto@...capital.net; mingo@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] x86, mpx: use new tsk_get_xsave_addr()
> 
> On 04/22/2015 12:18 PM, Yu, Fenghua wrote:
> >> > @@ -498,12 +497,12 @@ out_unmap:
> >> >   * bound table is 16KB. With 64-bit mode, the size of BD is 2GB,
> >> >   * and the size of each bound table is 4MB.
> >> >   */
> >> > -static int do_mpx_bt_fault(struct xsave_struct *xsave_buf)
> >> > +static int do_mpx_bt_fault(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > Do you need the parameter "tsk"? It's not used in this function.
> > Seems this function doesn't need to take any parameter.
> 
> See the last patch in the series, please.

Yes, the last patch removes the tsk. Sorry, I was not in cc list in other patches except 1 and 2.

Thanks.

-Fenghua
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ