[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5538A4E2.5020900@profitbricks.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:53:06 +0200
From: Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hal@....mellanox.co.il,
Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/27] IB/Verbs: Use management helper cap_ipoib()
On 04/22/2015 07:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:49:44AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 04/22/2015 07:40 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Michael Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Introduce helper cap_ipoib() to help us check if the port of an
>>>> IB device support IP over Infiniband.
>>>
>>> I thought we were dropping this in favor of listing the actual
>>> features the ULP required unconditionally? One of my messages had the
>>> start of a list..
>>
>> Shall we drop it now or wait until the mechanism introduced?
>>
>> Just wondering the requirement of ULP could be similar to the
>> requirement of management, isn't it? if the device can tell
>> which ULP it support, then may be a cap_XX() make sense in here?
>
> You have to audit the ipoib dirver and see what core functions it
> calls that have cap requirements themselves.
>
> At least SA, multicast and CM. It also requires cap_ib_ah() or
> whatever we called that.
I get your point :-) I'd like to suggest we put these in different threads:
1. bitmask reform
2. ulp check mechanism
3. naming (i think it'll be a really big discussion :-P)
Separate them can help us focus on a particular topic at once, and the
purpose of patches will be more clear ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> JAson
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists