linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] IB/Verbs: IB Management Helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5538AF29.2080901@profitbricks.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 10:36:57 +0200
From:	Michael Wang <yun.wang@...fitbricks.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
CC:	Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hal@....mellanox.co.il" <hal@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Tom Tucker <tom@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
	"raisch@...ibm.com" <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>,
	Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>,
	Faisal Latif <faisal.latif@...el.com>,
	Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] IB/Verbs: IB Management Helpers



On 04/22/2015 06:57 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:59:52AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> 
>>> 2)The name rdma_tech_* is lame.
>>> rdma_transport_*(), adhering to the above (*) remark, is much better.
>>> For example, both IB and ROCE *do* use the same transport. 
>>
>> I especially want to second this.  I haven't really been happy with the
>> rdma_tech_* names at all.
> 
> I'm not excited about the names either..
> 
> cap_ is bad because it pollutes the global namespace.
> 
> rdma_tech_ .. as used, this is selecting the standard the port
> implements. The word 'standard' is a better choice than 'transport',
> and 'technology' is often synonymous with 'standard'. Meh.
> 
> I've said it already, but this patch set has probably gotten too
> big. If we could just do the cap conversion without messing with other
> stuff, or adding rdma_tech, that would really be the best.
> 
> Nobody seems to like the rdma_tech parts of this series.
> 
> I'd also drop '[PATCH v5 09/27] IB/Verbs: Reform IB-core
> verbs/uverbs_cmd/sysfs' - that is UAPI stuff, it could be done as a
> followup someday, not worth the risk right now.

There won't be risk... the logical is clear that they will return
the same result, but I'll drop the modification on link_layer_show()
and ib_uverbs_query_port() anyway, since they are just try to get the
link-layer type and we are not going to erase that helper anymore.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> Jason
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/