[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <553A7C73.7040002@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 20:25:07 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mdio-gpio: support access that may sleep
On 04/24/2015 06:56 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Some systems using mdio-gpio may use gpio on message based busses, which
>>> require sleeping (e.g. gpio from an I2C I/O expander).
>>> Since this driver does not use IRQ handler, it is safe to use the
>>> _cansleep suffixed gpio accessors.
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
>> Since this is down underneath the layer of an MII bus, you cannot
>> universally say that these routines are always called in a sleepable
>> context.
>> The PHY layer, and the driver itself above that, might call these
>> routines from timers, interruptes etc.
> The PHY library calls these routines from its state machine workqueue
> for that reason, or from process context (when invoked via ethtool
> ioctl). The only special case is phy_mac_interrupt() which is callable
> from interrupt context,
It is not (as we have discussed recently) -- cancel_work_sync() may sleep.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists