lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomtkPCwHN1ivTSLOg9xj8nKGua=m8LerRG_djMfOr1DiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Apr 2015 15:56:18 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: arm_big_little: check if the frequency is
 set correctly

On 27 April 2015 at 15:21, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> wrote:
> The actual frequency is set through "clk_change_rate" which is void
> function. If the underlying hardware fails and returns error, the error
> is lost in the clk layer. In order to track such failures, we need to
> read back the frequency(just the cached value as clk_recalc called after
> clk->ops->set_rate gets the frequency)
>
> This patch adds check to see if the frequency is set correctly or if
> they were any hardware failures and sends the appropriate errors to the
> cpufreq core.
>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Turquette <mike.turquette@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> index e1a6ba66a7f5..f65e19f340d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> @@ -186,6 +186,15 @@ bL_cpufreq_set_rate(u32 cpu, u32 old_cluster, u32 new_cluster, u32 rate)
>                 mutex_unlock(&cluster_lock[old_cluster]);
>         }
>
> +       /*
> +        * FIXME: clk_set_rate has to handle the case where clk_change_rate
> +        * can fail due to hardware or firmware issues. Until the clk core
> +        * layer is fixed, we can check here. In most of the cases we will
> +        * be reading only the cached value anyway. This needs to  be removed
> +        * once clk core is fixed.
> +        */
> +       if (bL_cpufreq_get_rate(cpu) != new_rate)
> +               return -EIO;
>         return 0;
>  }

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ