lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:52:43 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/uncore: fix IMC missing box initialization On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 03:43:32AM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote: > > > > > > This leads me to believe that this patch: > > > > > > commit c05199e5a57a579fea1e8fa65e2b511ceb524ffc > > > Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com> > > > Date: Tue Jan 20 04:54:25 2015 +0000 > > > > > > perf/x86/intel/uncore: Move uncore_box_init() out of driver > > initialization > > > > > > If I revert it, I bet things will work again. > > > > Yes the initialization needs to be moved out of the IPI context. I'm for the clean revert I think. Crashing is bad, but hiding/delaying it seems counter productive too, it'll just mean we'll only learn about it later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists