[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <553F66B6.9020504@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 12:53:42 +0200
From: Lukasz Skalski <l.skalski@...sung.com>
To: David Lang <david@...g.hm>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Havoc Pennington <hp@...ox.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On 04/28/2015 12:29 AM, David Lang wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015, Lukasz Skalski wrote:
>
> aren't we being told that part of the reason for needing kdbus is that
> thousands, or tens of thousands of messages are being spewed out? how
> does limiting it to 128 messages represent real-life if this is the case?
>
AFAIK, at this moment some limits (like for example maximum number of
queued requests waiting for a reply or ) for both - DBus daemon and
kdbus, are the same (or at least quite similar).
> David Lang
>
>
--
Lukasz Skalski
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
l.skalski@...sung.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists