linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 06/11] usb: dwc3: soft reset to it's own function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:16:21 +0300
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc:	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 06/11] usb: dwc3: soft reset to it's own function

> > + * dwc3_soft_reset - Issue soft reset
> > + * @dwc: Pointer to our controller context structure
> > + */
> > +static int dwc3_soft_reset(struct dwc3 *dwc)
> 
> I don't see this being called anywhere else in your series and I would
> really like to know when we would need to reset the core again ?
> 
> I don't oppose to having this split to own function because I rather
> like how it looks, but I don't want to reset the IP needlessly either.

This series seems to be missing the last patch for dwc3, where I
actually add the ULPI support to dwc3 :-p. How have I managed to
prepare this series with one patch from the middle missing?!?! The
cover letter seems to be correct.

I'll resend the patches 8-12/12.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/