[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150429144232.GC18867@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:42:32 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: al.stone@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
leo.duran@....com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, msalter@...hat.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm/arm64: ACPI: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:31:03AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>
>
> On 04/29/2015 09:04 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 08:44:08AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >> From ACPIv6 (http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf),
> >>section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA object to be
> >>specified for DMA-cabpable devices. This patch introduces ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA
> >>in arm and arm64 Kconfig to specify such requirement.
> >>
> >>Note that when _CCA is required, if it is missing in the DSDT. ACPI driver
> >>will default to setting up devices as non-coherent.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
> >>Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
> >>---
> >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> >> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 3 +++
> >> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >>index 45df48b..2a0d036 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> >>@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >> config ARM
> >> bool
> >> default y
> >>+ select ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA if ACPI
> >> select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
> >> select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
> >> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> >
> >Any plans for ACPI on 32-bit ARM?
>
> Not that I am aware, but I could be totally wrong. The reason I am adding
> this here for 32-bit ARM is because the ACPI spec mentioned this.
>
> If you think this is not necessary until we introduce ACPI for ARM32, it can
> be removed.
I think it should be removed (as long as ACPI cannot be selected on
arm32).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists