linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: acpi: Add ACPI0008 Ambient Light Sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:33:18 +0200
From:	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:	Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Cc:	jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
	pmeerw@...erw.net, marxin.liska@...il.com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: acpi: Add ACPI0008 Ambient Light Sensor

On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 01:51:21 PM, Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 April 2015 13:27:25 Gabriele Mazzotta wrote:
> > Add basic implementation of the ACPI0008 Ambient Light Sensor driver.
> > This driver currently supports only the ALI property, yet is ready to
> > be easily extended to handle ALC, ALT, ALP ones as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Liska <marxin.liska@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > ---
> > This continues http://marc.info/?t=140163463200002
> > 
> > I've made few adjustments over the original patch:
> >  - Code aligned with 4.1-rc1 and cleaned up
> >  - Use signed integers to store values: sensors report 32bit signed
> >  
> >    values. In particular, -1 is reported when the current reading
> >    is above the supported range of sensitivity.
> > 
> > Most of the changes are just a consequence of the changes in the
> > iio subsystem.
> > 
> > Gabriele
> 
> I'm sorry, I've just noticed that I haven't changed the value of
> realbits in acpi_als_channels. This makes me wonder what would be the
> proper value, given that this is a generic driver and all the
> information I have are those in the ACPI specification (which states
> what I reported here above).
> 
> Should I just set realbits to 32?

I believe the ALS reports only 16bit signel value, no ?
My observation with a strong coherent light source is that
the saturated sensor reported 0xffff .

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/