[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554112B9.2060102@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:49:53 +0530
From: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tracing/mm: Don't trace mm_page_pcpu_drain on offline
cpus
On Wednesday 29 April 2015 10:38 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> I am not sure if its worth the effort now. It doesn't look like any
>> other trace point apart from the above use case will benefit from it.
>> Only smbus_write and smbus_reply seem to come close. But even they need
>> separate TP_fast_assign.
>
> It shouldn't be a problem to implement. But I'm currently cleaning up
> those files, and any changes will cause nasty conflicts.
>
> Lets do this. Push the current changes as is, and when I get around to
> adding a DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT_CONDITION(), we can modify that code to use
> it.
>
Okay, sure.
Thanks,
Shreyas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists