linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched, numa: Document usages of mm->numa_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55411F91.6050101@hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:14:41 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To:	Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched, numa: Document usages of mm->numa_scan_seq

On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote:
> The p->mm->numa_scan_seq is accessed using READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE
> and modified without exclusive access. It is not clear why it is
> accessed this way. This patch provides some documentation on that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Low<jason.low2@...com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/fair.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>   1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 5a44371..794f7d7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -1794,6 +1794,11 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
>   	u64 runtime, period;
>   	spinlock_t *group_lock = NULL;
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The p->mm->numa_scan_seq gets updated without
> +	 * exclusive access. Use READ_ONCE() here to ensure
> +	 * that the field is read in a single access.
> +	 */
>   	seq = READ_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
>   	if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
>   		return;
> @@ -2107,6 +2112,13 @@ void task_numa_fault(int last_cpupid, int mem_node, int pages, int flags)
>
>   static void reset_ptenuma_scan(struct task_struct *p)
>   {
> +	/*
> +	 * We only did a read acquisition of the mmap sem, so
> +	 * p->mm->numa_scan_seq is written to without exclusive access.
> +	 * That's not much of an issue though, since this is just used
> +	 * for statistical sampling. Use WRITE_ONCE and READ_ONCE, which
> +	 * are not expensive, to avoid load/store tearing.
> +	 */
>   	WRITE_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq, READ_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq) + 1);
>   	p->mm->numa_scan_offset = 0;
>   }

READ_ONCE followed by a WRITE_ONCE won't stop load/store tearing from 
happening unless you use an atomic instruction to do the increment. So I 
think your comment may be a bit misleading.

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/